|
Full name: Ben Goldacre
Area of interest: The misrepresentation of science in the media
Journals/Organisation: The Guardian
Email: ben@badscience.net
Personal website: http://www.badscience.net
Website: http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/bengoldacre
Blog: Comment is free...
Representation:
Networks: https://twitter.com/#!/bengoldacre
|
Biography:
About:
Education: Magdalen College, Oxford: medicine - with a first class degree in his preclinical studies; University College, London: clinical medicine
Career: Written for Time Out, New Statesman, and the British Medical Journal, has written the Bad Science column in the Guardian since 2003
Current position/role: Journalist
- also writes/has written for:
Other roles/Main role: Junior Medical Doctor
Other activities:
Disclosures:
Viewpoints/Insight: Bad Science.com: audio and media
Broadcast media:
Video: Appears regularly on BBC Radio 4 and TV
Controversy/Criticism:
Awards/Honours: Awards (Wikipedia)
Scoops:
Other: Son of singer Susan Traynor a.k.a. Noosha Fox
|
Books & Debate:
Latest work:
Speaking/Appearances:
Debate:
|
The Guardian:
Column name: Bad Science
Remit/Info: Criticism of scientific inaccuracy, health scares, pseudoscience and quackery (esp. examples from the mass media, consumer product marketing and complementary and alternative medicine in Britain) - see the Bad Science Manifesto and (Wikipedia info)
Section: Home pages
Role: Columnist
Pen-name:
Email: bad.science@guardian.co.uk
Website: Science / Bad Science; Guardian.co / Ben Goldacre
Commissioning editor:
Day published: Saturday
Regularity: Weekly
Column format:
Average length: 500/700 words
|
Articles: 2011
- What eight years of writing the Bad Science column have taught me - Pulling bad science apart is the best teaching gimmick I know for explaining how good science works - 5th November
- DIY statistical analysis: experience the thrill of touching real data - The story of one man's efforts to re-analyse the stats behind a BBC report on bowel cancer is a heartwarmingly nerdy one - 29th October
- Will asking a question get your science paper cited more? - Lots of stuff other than content can influence why scientific papers are cited by academics - 15th October
- There's a wealth of data out there – why not let us use it? - Much everyday government data is locked down hard, but the benefits of sharing it are potentially huge - 8th October
- If you want answers, why not run your own trials? - All you need is a computer, some volunteers and time on your hands - 1st October
- The dangers of cherry-picking evidence - It's one thing to produce a bias-free experiment – but the second, crucial stage is to synthesise the evidence fairly - 24th September
- The special trick that helps identify dodgy stats - Using Benford's law, forensic statisticians can spot suspicious patterns in the raw numbers, and estimate the chances figures have been tampered with - 17th September
- The statistical error that just keeps on coming - The same statistical errors – namely, ignoring the "difference in differences" – are appearing throughout the most prestigious journals in neuroscience - 10th September
- Academic publishers run a guarded knowledge economy - The business model for scholarly papers forms a barrier to the public, but can such walls remain standing? - 3rd September
- Vitamin pills can lead you to take health risks - Trials show that people who think they've done something healthy, even if they haven't, smoke more and believe they are invulnerable to diseases - 27th August
- Unemployment is rising – or is that statistical noise? - Small variations in figures get politicians and commentators excited, but we may be wrong to read patterns into them - 20th August
- Researchers don't mean to exaggerate, but lots of things can distort findings - It's possible people are not bothering to report a negative result alongside positive ones they found - 13th August
- Any set of figures needs adjusting before it can be usefully reported - Tricky concept ahoy – so cue some nerdy tables - 6th August
- Anecdotes are great – if they convey data accurately - Channel 4 reported that a study in the Lancet showed a new drug had reduced the symptoms of Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. Unfortunately, the study shows no such thing - 29th July
- The problem with badger culls - We need a badger cull trial held in the real world ... to give us answers that matter, on results we care about, with the intervention we're actually using - 23rd July
- Studies of studies show that we get things wrong - Of 51 reports, 16 found that a practice currently believed to be effective was, in fact, ineffective - 16th July
- Effective things can come from silly places - Even if you're wrong about how something works, it might still work - 9th July
- The true purpose of a drug trial is not always obvious - Medical trials are not always conducted to test the drug – sometimes it's to test the market - 2nd July
- Misleading money-saving claims help no one - Claiming you can get councils cheaper mobile phone deals does not equate to 20% off a £50bn spend - 25th June
- The deeper the data set, the more it can tell you - Watching patterns emerge from the results of a really large study still gives me a sense of beauty and awe - 11th June
- Are mobiles a health risk? There's no answer yet - How can the public make an informed decision when there are so many variables? - 4th June
- Children don't need Brain Gym to spot nonsense - Information is more accessible than ever for smart, motivated people – and, yes, kids too – so let's allow them to share it - 28th May
- How can we corral data to reveal the big picture? - Belief systems are backed by a variety of research but it's not nuggets of information we need but rather a view of the whole - 21st May
- How can you tell if a policy is working? Run a trial - Trials never happen because politicians are too scared of hard data on their good intentions - 14th May
- How flimsy research gets inferior drugs to market - Bad evidence on whether drugs really work can arise simply because nobody asked the right research question - 7th May
- Backwards step on looking into the future - Scientific journals can be as bad as newspapers in preferring eye-catching stories to negative findings - 23rd April
- NHS leaflet mixes past and present - The government is using old statistics to make misleading claims about the need for change - 16th April
- Press bandwagon on antidepressants makes for depressing reading - A cursory look at widely available research easily explains a rise in prescriptions. And no, it has nothing to do with the recession - 9th April
- Anarchy in the UK? That depends on how you handle the numbers - Whether people are taking part in cuts protests or sport, it pays to be careful when it comes to counting them - 2nd April
- Budget boost for clinical trials - New body should end bizarre paradox in medicine and make trials cheaper and easier to run - 26th March
- A case of never letting the source spoil a good story - Perhaps it's too embarrassing for some writers to risk linking to primary sources that readers can check for themselves - 19th March
- Plainly put, cigarette packaging matters - Imposing plain packaging on cigarettes would change how we smoke, and tobacco manufacturers know it even if Tory MP Philip Davies does not - 12th March
- Drug trial secrecy leaves us dependent on blind faith - The revolving door between regulators and companies is less important than the European Medicines Agency's lack of transparency - 5th March
- How security can be more theatre than reality - Drug-detecting dogs and hi-tech brain scans to spot liars – examples of how we are still buying into the placebo effect - 26th February
- In case of overdose, consult a lifeguard - The authorities have just finished a lengthy consultation to decide how homeopathy pills should be labelled. How amusing - 19th February
- Don't cherry-pick NHS findings, minister - Health minister Paul Burstow is making the same errors on overstating NHS failings as his boss Andrew Lansley - 12th February
- Evidence supporting your NHS reforms? What evidence, Mr Lansley? - The NHS has had 15 reorganisations in 30 years. Crucial data on whether any have worked is woefully lacking - 5th February
- Hidden the workings out? You might as well be a Raelian - Sibling statistics, software secrecy and study shortcuts all show why scientific authority derives from transparency - 29th January
- Feeling low? Don't blame Blue Monday - Despite hype around the 'most depressing day in the year' there is no reason to believe people are more miserable in January - 22nd January
- Now you see it, now you don't: why journals need to rethink retractions - With errors sometimes perpetuated for years, academics need to know the reason for a paper being retracted - 15th January
- Do 600 unwanted pregnancies really make an exceptional story? - Media claims about contraceptive implant 'failure' don't put figures into context - 8th January
|
Articles: 2010
- Dodgy dealings in tough year for whistleblowers - It's been a marvellous year for bullshit and pseudoscience - 18th December
- A migraine-inducing libel case - The US medical device company NMT are suing Peter Wilmshurst over his comments about the MIST trial - 12th December (Comment)
- Mutual criticism is vital in science. Libel laws threaten it - Libel laws that restrict scientists and doctors scrutinising each others' ideas and practices are dangerous - 9th December (Comment)
- It's painfully easy to trick the mind into seeing things that aren't there - People often manipulate what they have experienced to create an illusion of causality - 4th December 2010
- How to make people 'love' nuclear power - A poll on whether a new nuclear power station should be built at Hinkley Point provides a masterclass in manipulation - 20th November
- Missing from the lifestyle pages: the evidence of how Boob Job works - Enough to make your décolletage blush: cosmetics firm threatens plastic surgeon who doubts breast cream boasts - 13th November
- Good scientific research often ends up making a glorious mess -Popular science tends to talk as if we have clear answers, but genuine studies constantly produce magn ificently conflicting results - 6th November
- Lost your libido? Let's try a little neuro-realism, madam - A study of women's libido raises questions about why brain imaging is used to make mental states 'real' for the public - 30th October
- The unacceptable face of medical research - News that the US infected asylum inmates with sexual diseases in the 1940s has caused outrage – and raised questions about participation in medical trials today - 23rd October
- The Daily Mail cancer story that torpedoes itself in paragraph 19 - Studies of newspaper readers show that a late caveat is not enough - 16th October
- A genetic cause for ADHD won't necessarily reduce the stigma attached - Scientists who believe that labelling mental health problems 'an illness' will reduce prejudice may find the opposite is true - 9th October
- Punishment does not fit crimes with the most victims - Empathy explains why Two Little Boys makes me cry yet two million Aids deaths a year never have the same effect - 2nd October
- Pornography scandalises the Sun, but it may help in IVF - There is evidence that sexual images can increase sperm count – in animals and humans - 25th September
- Medical ghostwriters who build a brand - There are no rules against this, just traditions, good faith, and leaky regulations - 18th September
- Pope's anti-condom message is sabotage in fight against Aids - Stance makes Catholic church a major global public health problem - 11th September
- Keeping up appearances - A new study demonstrates that how women musicians dress alters the perception of how they play - 4th September
- Costly life-saving drugs: you have to draw the line somewhere - The press reported Avastin's 'life-saving properties' with an anecdote about one person, totally ignoring the treatment's reality - 28th August
- Are exams getting easier? Nobody knows - For all the controversy about the ability of our children, there is a paucity of research on the subject - 21st August
- Drug firms hiding negative research are unfit to experiment on people - Another pharmaceutical giant has settled a big compensation claim. So why are they allowed to go on misleading the public? - 14th August
- Home Office figures for Sarah's law – fact or fiction? - Claims that 60 children have been protected from child abuse by pilot scheme are impossible to verify - 7th August
- A 'shoot-out' between methods won't help us teach more children to read - Schools need large, robust randomised trials to help them decide which teaching methods to use - 31st July
- Don't like your findings? Spin them away - Even those carrying out formal academic research are guilty of twisting scientific facts to suit their purposes - 24th July
- Diabetes drug 'victory' is really an ugly story about incompetence - Rosiglitazone has been a magnet for disappointing behaviour since it was first marketed in 1999 - 17th July
- Fish oil salesmen find EU in the way - It's tough wading through health claims for food supplements, but Brussels has rejected 80% of 900 examined so far - 10th July
- When the scientific evidence is unwelcome, people try to reason it away - Research results not consistent with your world view? Then you're likely to believe science can't supply all the answers - 3rd July
- Predictions are fine, but there are better ways to protect a population - Last year's earthquake in Abruzzo in Italy shows it is impossible to predict certain tragedies – but that hasn't stopped the seismologists being blamed - 19th June
- Why crossing your fingers works … if you're lucky - In laboratory conditions, people who are superstitious can succeed. Does that apply in real life? - 12th June
- Omega-3 lesson: Not so much brain boost as fishy research - One tiny brain-imaging study of fatty acids has been used to endorse fish oil as education's magic pill - 5th June
- How Martin Gardner warned us to beware the bee people from Mars - The writings of this debunker of pseudoscience show us how little has changed in the last 60 years - 29th May
- Drug treatment policy needs a dose of evidence - Grand promises from governments mean little without decent analysis - 22nd May
- If we can't help whistleblowers, then we won't hear their call - A BMA survey shows doctors fears over reporting concerns about patient safety. But are they just being melodramatic? - 15th May
- For election data that matters, we have our nerds to thank - Need to know who won where, or what dodgy statistics politicians deployed? Then don't expect the state to provide - 8th May (Cif at the polls)
- The power of election smears - How putting the facts straight entrenches deeply-held prejudices - 1st May 2010
- At last, the rise of evidence-based voting - Not only can we test claims made by politicians in this election, we can use data that has been previously hard to find - 24th April (Cif at the polls)
- Libel laws: a lethal muzzle of medicine - The chiropractors' absurd pursuit of Simon Singh is over, but libel laws are still a real health hazard - 16th April
- Conviction for patients' deaths does not add up - A Dutch nurse given life for murdering seven people in a killing spree that never happened will hear about her appeal on Wednesday. Will the people who jailed her apologise? - 10th April
- The absurdity of patenting genes - A court has overturned patents owned by Myriad on the BRCA1 breast cancer gene. But such patents can have a chilling effect on research - 3rd April
- Sex, statistics and Sunderland - Wild claims linking Facebook to a rise in syphilis only add to the wealth of misinformation - 27th March
- Antibiotics don't cure colds, so why do patients think they do? - Imaginative trial shows antibiotics are only marginally helpful in treating colds, but doctors who cave into patient pressure create demand - 20th March
- No bugs were harmed in the media reporting of infested trains - The figures for bugs in train compartments sound a little bit on the high side. Where did they come from? - 13th March
- Smoking prevents Alzheimer's? It depends who you ask - Papers by people with links to the tobacco industry play down the risks of Alzheimer's associated with smoking - 6th March
- Homeopathy doesn't work. But are the claims for other medicines any better? - Drug ads that don't back up their claims show how dumb doctors can be about evidence and how lax regulation has become - 27th February
- Faith makes regulating herbal medicine difficult - A judge this week called for traditional medicine to be regulated, but it's not easy when practitioners make claims based on faith -20th February
- Bad Science: Accidents of birth and incidence of trigger-happy puppies - How rare is it really for three siblings to be born on the same date? - 13th February
- Expert view: The media are equally guilty over the MMR vaccine scare - Andrew Wakefield was at the centre of a media storm about the MMR vaccine and is now being blamed by journalists as if he were the only one at fault - 28th January
- Animal research study shows many tests are full of flaws - Whether you support or detest such experiments, it's important to know if they are well conducted - 23rd January
- Did aliens help to line up Woolworths stores? - Researcher Tom Brooks reckons primitive man was a navigational genius. It's true, but only if you ignore the evidence to the contrary - 16th January
- Public v private sector pay: the figures don't add up - There is no firm evidence either way to assess earnings 'gulf' - 9th Janaury
|
Articles: 2009
- A vintage year. Expect more in 2010 - There are a lot of people out there who want people like us to shut up. That's their bad luck - 19th December
- Climate change? Well, we'll be dead by then - Why do roughly half the people in this country not believe in man-made climate change, when the overwhelming majority of scientists do? - 12th December
- Making contact with a helping hand - Recent studies have found that claims made for 'facilitated communication' were unsubstantiated - 5th December
- Homeopathy and the nocebo effect - Dr Peter Fisher from the Royal London Homeopathic hospital (funded by the NHS) says homeopathic pills have physical side-effects. Can a sugar pill have a side-effect? - 28th November
- Dithering over statins' side-effects label finally ends - The pharmaceutical industry has taken almost two years to disseminate important information - 21st November
- Exploded: the myth of a miracle bomb detector - The New York Times and the magician James Randi have uncovered a nonsense of truly epic proportions - 14th November
- Are your drugs laws working? Ask a scientist - Not just molecules: the lesson of David Nutt's sacking is that evidence-based policy relies on good quality research - 7th November
- Influence from the Sun and the Moon - Every now and then, it's fun to dip into the world of politics and find ou t what our lords and masters are saying about science - 31st October
- HIV and Aids: debate or denial? - A lot of strange stuff can fly in under the claim that you are 'simply starting a debate' - 24th October
- Chiropractors cause controversy - Most people hadn't noticed chiropractors before they sued Simon Singh. Now the internet is awash with reviews of the evidence that raise questions about whether chiropractic is effective in conditions they had claimed it could treat - 17th October
- Cancer jab fantasy closes down a debate - Professor Diane Harper's own words correct misrepresentations in story about cervical cancer treatment Cervarix - 10th October
- The damning verdict on drug trials - While the media wound themselves up into a frenzy, a much more important story was hidden away in a dry academic journal - 3rd October
- Pernicious film of Aids denialist propaganda - It would take two months of columns to address all the bogus claims of House of Numbers, a new film about Aids - 26th September
- Libel reform will stay on the fringe - Do I welcome the Liberal Democrats' stance on libel? Actually, I don't believe anyone in power will ever ditch these unfair laws - 22nd September (Comment is free)
- A Blueprint for how not to do research - Before we dismantle this Home Office report on drugs policy, can I just say I'm sure they've produced some other perfectly acceptable reports, and I shouldn't like any brittle souls to be dispirited by the criticisms that will follow - 19th September
- Peer review is flawed but the best we've got - Scientists should be free to pontificate in their internal professional literature - 12th September
- Saving lives? It's patently obvious - In developing countries drug patents may be doing more harm than good - 5th September
- Ducking Weldon's verbal grenades - Focusing on Fay Weldon's mischievous remarks about women detracts attention from the feminism debate we do need to have - 29th August
- Health warning: exercise makes you fat? - The Sunday Telegraph gives you permission to do nothing with a misleading feature that claims re-programming body fat is the key to weight loss, not working out - 29th August
- This column helps you lose weight. Honestly - Journalists can cheerfully make grand claims for a product that would be impossible in any advert - 15th August
- Hit and myth: curse of the ghostwriters - Two disturbing stories demonstrate the dangers of rejecting best practice of systematic review where the literature on a subject is surveyed methodically to find all the evidence - 8th August
- Argument is about capitalism, not food - A Food Standards Agency report on organic food triggered a swift response from the Soil Association - 1st August
- An intrepid, ragged band of bloggers - Chiropractors may regret choosing to sue Simon Singh, springing online scientists into action - 30th July
- Home Office research so feeble someone ought to be locked up - This study is possibly the most unclear I have ever seen in a professional environment - 18th July
- Revenge may not be so sweet after all - can science offer any practical help and insight in our pursuit of an evidence-based life? - 11th July
- PR and prejudice: why rape story erred - Printing speculative research about rape isn't just ridiculous, it's irresponsible - 4th July
- Magnetism, mystery and plain muddle - When is a conversation public, and when is it private? This problem rears its head with greater frequency in the age of the internet - 20th June
- Cocaine study that got up the nose of the US - A study which described mild cocaine use in positive tones prompted several blown outrage fuses - 13th June
- Illegal downloads and dodgy figures - I doubt that every download is lost revenue, since people who download more also buy more music - 6th June
- Quacks, hacks and pressing problems with press releases - Obviously we distrust the media on science: they rewrite commercial press releases from dodgy organisations as if they were news - 30th May
- Man flu and the difference between mice and men - An NHS website with 6m monthly visitors is helping dispel health myths behind the headlines - 23rd May
- Speculation, hypothesis and ideas. But where's the evidence? - It is possible that much of Professor Baroness Susan Greenfield's output on the effects of using computers is speculative flim-flam - 16th May
- The danger of drugs … and data - Bad information in medical literature leads doctors to make irrational prescribing decisions, which ultimately can cost lives, and cause unnecessary suffering, not to mention the expense - 9th May
- Come the pandemic, the drugs do work - I don't want to freak you out, but I'm not sure Tamiflu can save us all from Parmageddon - 2nd May
- Swine flu and hype – a media illness - Even if the predicted millions don't die, a risk is still a risk – and that's why I've turned down everyone from the BBC to al-Jazeera - 30th April
- From fish oil to the snake oil of fake trials - Does fish oil make your child less hyperactive? In some cases, according to over optimistic subgroup analysis - 25th April
- Cancer jabs, good or bad? The Mail's in two minds - Journalists wilfully misinterpret scientific evidence in order to generate stories that reflect their own prejudices - 18th April
- Research and nonsense: which is news? - The new survey on Auschwitz was not published in a journal because it tells us nothing - 4th April
- Warning: media reports on suicide can be fatal - The inclusion by the media of gratuitous detail in reports of suicides significantly increases the number of attempts - 28th March
- Science journalists? Don't make me laugh - British journalists go out of their way to cherry-pick which evidence they cover, and then explain it in the most unhelpful way possible - 21st March
- Medical scumbag's masterclass in fraud - False research results and fraudulent practices in medical research are not that uncommon - 14th March
- Metaphorically speaking, Pepsi's gibberish is hard to swallow - Across huge swaths of the world scientific reasoning is regarded as decorative - 7th March
- Spying on 60 million people doesn't add up - We are invited to accept that everybody's data will be surveyed and processed - 28th February
- Heroin seizures: name your own price - In a week where our dear Daily Mail ran How Using Facebook Could Raise Your Risk of Cancer, I will exercise some self-control, and write about drugs instead - 21st February
- Funding and findings: the impact factor - This column is about tainted medical research, not MMR - 14th February
- Perils on the road to PR-reviewed data - 7th February
- Blue Monday? That's just too depressing - Ah yes, Dr Cliff Arnall's equation for the most depressing day of the year - the third Monday in January. This started life as a corporate puff for Sky Travel, but now Blue Monday has become part of the canon of pseudoscientific media myth - 24th January
- The things you can perk up with a cup of coffee - 17th January
- A detoxer in denial - My interest in Detox in a box was first piqued when they began to deny quotes from their own website - 10th January
- Will stupid people and their pseudoscience cost more lives this year? - 3rd January
|
Articles: 2008
- Vintage year for iffy studies and selective reporting - Rigorous scientific research languishes unpublicised while media continue to churn out bogus science stories - 27th December
- Bad statistics? The Sunday Times isn't kidding - The Times has started an innovative new column titled Bad Statistics. It seems to me to be somewhat lacking in thoroughness - 20th December
- How the Sun boobed over Britney equation - 13th December
- It's not what the papers say, it's what they don't - MMR vaccine played no part in death of child, but only the Telegraph has covered the outcome - 6th December
- Down's births: how BBC misread the evidence - 29th November
- When it comes to a cold, you might as well try goat entrails - 22nd November
- We're all losers in the numbers game - on where the number crunching figures appear from in consumer research surveys - 15th November
- Jackie's tale sets alarm bells ringing - the science of a disease is more interesting than made up nonsense about it - 8th November
- Foul air fallacies - on universities offering degrees in quackery - 1st November
- Listen carefully, I shall say this only once - Duplicate publication of data distorts a reader's impression of how much evidence is out there - 25th October
- Detecting faultlines in carbon monoxide servicing survey - 11th October
- Making space for the wild and wonderful - the simple fact that something has been "published" is becoming as meaningless as it always should have been: ideas are there to be read and critically appraised - 4th October
- Fish oil exam results fail all the tests - 27th September
- Missing in action: the trials that did not make the news - 20th September
- Don't let the facts spoil a good story - Academics' work can be 'grossly and crassly misrepresented' by the newspapers - 13th September
- With their money, myopia and abuses, these pill makers match big pharma - The food supplement industry likes to style itself as people's medicine, but the way it stifles debate is far from democratic - Guardian.co.uk - 12th September
- Cheer up: it's all down to random variation - Britain's happiest places have been mapped by scientists - 6th September
- A dose of reality - As the pace of medical innovation slows to a crawl, how do drug companies stay in profit? By 'discovering' new illnesses to fit existing products. But for most problems the cure will never be found in a pill - Comment - 1st September
- Healthy mind, healthy body - Maybe mindset alone can influence metabolism and the benefits of exercise - 23rd August
- From the mouths of morons in the media - There's not exactly a whole bunch of news going on right now - 16th August
- Silly season, silly machine - What is the mysterious QXCI machine? - 9th August
- Working out the fame formula - So event-related fame declines rapidly with time? I don't think anyone is desperately surprised - 2nd August
- A need for self-reflection - The papers are alive with criticism for quack nutritionism after the case of Dawn Page - 26th July
- Still no cure for cancer hysteria - The newspapers are so profoundly overrun with pseudoscience about food that there's no point in documenting it any longer - 19th July
- Testing the plausibilty effect - Week in, week out, we see apparently scientific claims being made as if they were based on evidence, when in reality they are based on nothing more than authority, often from one man - 12th July
- Plagues of wasps, squirrels, rats? Let's see the data - 5th July
- Suicides, Aids, and a masts campaigner - 28th June
- Why reading should not be believing - 21st June
- How being swindled can make you feel better - 14th June
- Decline of maths? Just do the arithmetic - 7th June
- Determined bloggers who blew whistle - In this case it seems the bloggers win as branches of Dore close across the world - 31st May 2
- How to market a miracle cure - How do you judge if an intervention is effective when you hear about it in the media? - 24th May
- In pursuit of the perfect pitch - We would all do well to remember that elaborate runic rituals behind the scenes can have an enormous impact on what is heard - 17th May
- How pools of blood trials could save lives - In the United States last week the papers went crazy: artificial blood products cause a 30% increase in deaths - 10th May
- The missing finger that never was - The media is a confusing and inappropriate place to communicate new and unpublished epoch-making scientific breakthroughs - 3rd May
- Celebs decry evidence on vitamin pills - 26th April
- End is nigh for zombie slayers - 19th April
- Arbitrary decisions on additives - 12th April
- Deathless drug strategy buries good news - 5th April
- Fish oil pills, exam results and a belated retreat - 29th March
- Pep, zing, oomph, energy. You won't find them here - 15th March
- Drug data that flatters to deceive - 8th March
- Don't laugh, sugar pills are the future - 1st March
- Ticking the boxes before trying to save lives - 23rd February
- Nonsense dressed up as neuroscience - 16th February
- Fluoride, teeth, and an argument that's full of holes - 9th February
- Cannabis casualties, hybrid cars, and cubic litres - 2nd February
- Depression - the facts and the fables - 26th January
- With a Huff and a puff, I'll blow your stats down - 19th January
- To screen or not to screen - that is the question - 12th January
- Clinical trials and playing by the rules - 5th January
|
Articles: 2007
|
News & updates:
|
References:
|
Links:
|